OECD vs Poland: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures

OECD
8.22 million Square kilometres
in 2023
Poland
30,140 Square kilometres
in 2023
OECD rank
1st
Poland rank
4th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures over time

  • OECD
  • Poland
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

OECD currently reports 8.22 million Square kilometres against 30,140 Square kilometres in Poland, a difference of 8.19 million Square kilometres.

That makes OECD's figure about 272.7 times Poland's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.

OECD ranks 1st and Poland ranks 4th of 180 countries.

OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 9.41 million Square kilometres 42,309 Square kilometres 9.36 million Square kilometres OECD
1970s 9.34 million Square kilometres 41,532 Square kilometres 9.30 million Square kilometres OECD
1980s 9.09 million Square kilometres 40,593 Square kilometres 9.05 million Square kilometres OECD
1990s 8.89 million Square kilometres 40,650 Square kilometres 8.85 million Square kilometres OECD
2000s 8.85 million Square kilometres 34,380 Square kilometres 8.81 million Square kilometres OECD
2010s 8.37 million Square kilometres 31,770 Square kilometres 8.34 million Square kilometres OECD
2020s 8.23 million Square kilometres 29,722 Square kilometres 8.20 million Square kilometres OECD

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, OECD or Poland?
OECD, at 8.22 million Square kilometres against 30,140 Square kilometres in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures between OECD and Poland?
8.19 million Square kilometres, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do OECD and Poland rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures?
OECD ranks 1st and Poland ranks 4th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD vs Poland: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/oecd/poland-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/oecd/poland-2/">OECD vs Poland: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
207 places, 11,927 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata