Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures

Uruguay
120,000 Square kilometres
in 2023
Zimbabwe
121,000 Square kilometres
in 2023
Uruguay rank
42nd
Zimbabwe rank
41st

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures over time

  • Uruguay
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 121,000 Square kilometres against 120,000 Square kilometres in Uruguay, a difference of 1,000 Square kilometres.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Uruguay ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 180 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Uruguay averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uruguay Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 137,264 Square kilometres 91,400 Square kilometres 45,864 Square kilometres Uruguay
1970s 136,300 Square kilometres 94,740 Square kilometres 41,560 Square kilometres Uruguay
1980s 135,699 Square kilometres 98,250 Square kilometres 37,449 Square kilometres Uruguay
1990s 135,914 Square kilometres 105,714 Square kilometres 30,200 Square kilometres Uruguay
2000s 132,598 Square kilometres 119,120 Square kilometres 13,478 Square kilometres Uruguay
2010s 120,535 Square kilometres 121,000 Square kilometres 465 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2020s 120,000 Square kilometres 121,000 Square kilometres 1,000 Square kilometres Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, Uruguay or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 121,000 Square kilometres against 120,000 Square kilometres in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures between Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
1,000 Square kilometres, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Uruguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures?
Uruguay ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/uruguay/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/uruguay/zimbabwe/">Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
207 places, 11,927 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata