Australia vs Belarus: Land use hidden — Planted Forest

Australia
23,903 Square kilometres
in 2023
Belarus
22,431 Square kilometres
in 2023
Australia rank
21st
Belarus rank
24th

Land use hidden — Planted Forest over time

  • Australia
  • Belarus
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 23,903 Square kilometres against 22,431 Square kilometres in Belarus, a difference of 1,472 Square kilometres.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Australia ranks 21st and Belarus ranks 24th of 189 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Belarus in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 12,769 Square kilometres 15,649 Square kilometres 2,880 Square kilometres Belarus
2000s 17,921 Square kilometres 19,892 Square kilometres 1,970 Square kilometres Belarus
2010s 23,363 Square kilometres 21,865 Square kilometres 1,497 Square kilometres Australia
2020s 23,903 Square kilometres 22,278 Square kilometres 1,625 Square kilometres Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — planted forest, Australia or Belarus?
Australia, at 23,903 Square kilometres against 22,431 Square kilometres in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — planted forest between Australia and Belarus?
1,472 Square kilometres, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for land use hidden — planted forest?
Australia ranks 21st and Belarus ranks 24th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Planted Forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belarus: Land use hidden — Planted Forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-planted-forest/australia/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-planted-forest/australia/belarus/">Australia vs Belarus: Land use hidden — Planted Forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Planted Forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,122 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata