Belarus vs New Zealand: Land use hidden — Planted Forest

Belarus
22,431 Square kilometres
in 2023
New Zealand
21,335 Square kilometres
in 2023
Belarus rank
24th
New Zealand rank
25th

Land use hidden — Planted Forest over time

  • Belarus
  • New Zealand
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199020062023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 22,431 Square kilometres against 21,335 Square kilometres in New Zealand, a difference of 1,096 Square kilometres.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Zealand ahead.

Belarus ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 25th of 189 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 15,649 Square kilometres 18,028 Square kilometres 2,379 Square kilometres New Zealand
2000s 19,892 Square kilometres 20,248 Square kilometres 356.04 Square kilometres New Zealand
2010s 21,865 Square kilometres 20,336 Square kilometres 1,529 Square kilometres Belarus
2020s 22,278 Square kilometres 21,085 Square kilometres 1,193 Square kilometres Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — planted forest, Belarus or New Zealand?
Belarus, at 22,431 Square kilometres against 21,335 Square kilometres in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — planted forest between Belarus and New Zealand?
1,096 Square kilometres, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for land use hidden — planted forest?
Belarus ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 25th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Planted Forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs New Zealand: Land use hidden — Planted Forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-planted-forest/belarus/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-planted-forest/belarus/new-zealand/">Belarus vs New Zealand: Land use hidden — Planted Forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Planted Forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,122 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata