Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Planted Forest

Mexico
1,103 Square kilometres
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,080 Square kilometres
in 2023
Mexico rank
77th
Zimbabwe rank
78th

Land use hidden — Planted Forest over time

  • Mexico
  • Zimbabwe
5007501.0k1.2k1.5k199020062023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 1,103 Square kilometres against 1,080 Square kilometres in Zimbabwe, a difference of 23 Square kilometres.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mexico ranks 77th and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 189 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 395.78 Square kilometres 1,387 Square kilometres 991.22 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2000s 517.98 Square kilometres 1,146 Square kilometres 628.02 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2010s 819.74 Square kilometres 1,080 Square kilometres 260.26 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2020s 1,053 Square kilometres 1,080 Square kilometres 26.76 Square kilometres Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — planted forest, Mexico or Zimbabwe?
Mexico, at 1,103 Square kilometres against 1,080 Square kilometres in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — planted forest between Mexico and Zimbabwe?
23 Square kilometres, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — planted forest?
Mexico ranks 77th and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Planted Forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Planted Forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-planted-forest/mexico/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-planted-forest/mexico/zimbabwe/">Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Planted Forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Planted Forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,122 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata