Cayman Islands vs Gambia: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
19th
Gambia rank
16th

Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Gambia
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 19th and Gambia ranks 16th of 181 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0166 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0166 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0166 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0166 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0166 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0166 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0166 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Gambia?
Gambia, at 1.12 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.1 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Cayman Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Gambia?
0.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Gambia rank globally for land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 19th and Gambia ranks 16th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Gambia: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/gambia-the/">Cayman Islands vs Gambia: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Total area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.