Hong Kong vs Sri Lanka: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre

Hong Kong
1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
29th
Sri Lanka rank
27th

Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Sri Lanka
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 29th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0028 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0112 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 1.08 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0324 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0123 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0014 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0008 Square kilometres per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0035 Square kilometres per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Sri Lanka?
0 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Sri Lanka rank globally for land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 29th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Sri Lanka: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sri-lanka/">Hong Kong vs Sri Lanka: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Total area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.