Mozambique vs New Caledonia: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre

Mozambique
1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
82nd
New Caledonia rank
85th

Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre over time

  • Mozambique
  • New Caledonia
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 82nd and New Caledonia ranks 85th of 181 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0001 Square kilometres per square kilometre Mozambique
1970s 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0001 Square kilometres per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0001 Square kilometres per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0001 Square kilometres per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0001 Square kilometres per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0001 Square kilometres per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0001 Square kilometres per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre, Mozambique or New Caledonia?
Mozambique, at 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.02 Square kilometres per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre between Mozambique and New Caledonia?
0 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and New Caledonia rank globally for land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre?
Mozambique ranks 82nd and New Caledonia ranks 85th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs New Caledonia: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/new-caledonia/">Mozambique vs New Caledonia: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Total area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.