Rwanda vs United States: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre

Rwanda
1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
26th
United States rank
23rd

Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • United States
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

United States currently reports 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 26th and United States ranks 23rd of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 5 and United States in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda United States Difference Ahead
1960s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0164 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0164 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0164 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0164 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0117 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0071 Square kilometres per square kilometre United States
2020s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0071 Square kilometres per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre, Rwanda or United States?
United States, at 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre between Rwanda and United States?
0 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United States?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and United States rank globally for land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 26th and United States ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs United States: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/united-states/">Rwanda vs United States: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Total area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.