Tanzania vs United States: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre

Tanzania
1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania rank
25th
United States rank
23rd

Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre over time

  • Tanzania
  • United States
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

United States currently reports 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Tanzania ranks 25th and United States ranks 23rd of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 5 and United States in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania United States Difference Ahead
1960s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0181 Square kilometres per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0181 Square kilometres per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0181 Square kilometres per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.05 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0181 Square kilometres per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.06 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0134 Square kilometres per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0053 Square kilometres per square kilometre United States
2020s 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0053 Square kilometres per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre, Tanzania or United States?
United States, at 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 1.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre between Tanzania and United States?
0 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and United States?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tanzania and United States rank globally for land use hidden — total area, per square kilometre?
Tanzania ranks 25th and United States ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs United States: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-total-area-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/united-states/">Tanzania vs United States: Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Total area, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Total area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.