Svalbard and Jan Mayen vs Chinese Taipei: Land use over the long term
Svalbard and Jan Mayen
0
in 2025
Chinese Taipei
0
in 2025
Svalbard and Jan Mayen rank
188th
Chinese Taipei rank
188th
Land use over the long term over time
- Svalbard and Jan Mayen
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Svalbard and Jan Mayen currently reports 0 against 0 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.
Across all 108 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Svalbard and Jan Mayen ranks 188th and Chinese Taipei ranks 188th of 199 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 40 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Svalbard and Jan Mayen | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1100s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1200s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1300s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1400s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1500s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1600s | 0 | 62,283 | 62,283 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1700s | 0 | 279,520 | 279,520 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1710s | 0 | 313,869 | 313,869 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1720s | 0 | 325,945 | 325,945 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1730s | 0 | 338,293 | 338,293 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1740s | 0 | 350,890 | 350,890 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1750s | 0 | 363,707 | 363,707 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1760s | 0 | 376,711 | 376,711 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1770s | 0 | 389,858 | 389,858 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1780s | 0 | 403,096 | 403,096 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1790s | 0 | 416,360 | 416,360 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1800s | 0 | 429,571 | 429,571 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1810s | 0 | 442,632 | 442,632 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1820s | 0 | 455,424 | 455,424 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1830s | 0 | 456,805 | 456,805 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1840s | 0 | 460,237 | 460,237 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1850s | 0 | 462,639 | 462,639 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1860s | 0 | 463,112 | 463,112 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1870s | 0 | 461,604 | 461,604 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1880s | 0 | 458,759 | 458,759 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1890s | 0 | 453,152 | 453,152 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1900s | 0 | 493,604 | 493,604 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1910s | 0 | 531,870 | 531,870 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1920s | 0 | 564,373 | 564,373 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1930s | 0 | 635,367 | 635,367 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1940s | 0 | 710,995 | 710,995 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1950s | 0 | 708,268 | 708,268 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1960s | 0 | 501,938 | 501,938 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1970s | 0 | 501,938 | 501,938 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1980s | 0 | 501,938 | 501,938 | Chinese Taipei |
| 1990s | 0 | 501,938 | 501,938 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2000s | 0 | 501,938 | 501,938 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 0 | 501,938 | 501,938 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2020s | 0 | 418,282 | 418,282 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land use over the long term, Svalbard and Jan Mayen or Chinese Taipei?
- Svalbard and Jan Mayen, at 0 against 0 in Chinese Taipei as of 2025.
- What is the difference in land use over the long term between Svalbard and Jan Mayen and Chinese Taipei?
- 0, with Svalbard and Jan Mayen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Svalbard and Jan Mayen and Chinese Taipei?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1000 to 2025.
- How do Svalbard and Jan Mayen and Chinese Taipei rank globally for land use over the long term?
- Svalbard and Jan Mayen ranks 188th and Chinese Taipei ranks 188th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Land use over the long term. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.