Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Land used for aquaculture — Area
Land used for aquaculture — Area over time
- Estonia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.08 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.08 1000 ha.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 22 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.024 1000 ha | 0.0833 1000 ha | 0.0593 1000 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0134 1000 ha | 0.08 1000 ha | 0.0666 1000 ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land used for aquaculture — area, Estonia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.08 1000 ha against 0 1000 ha in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in land used for aquaculture — area between Estonia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.08 1000 ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for land used for aquaculture — area?
- Estonia ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land used for aquaculture — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.