Americas vs Republic of Moldova: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Americas
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Americas currently reports 8.9 kg/ha against 5.81 kg/ha in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 3.09 kg/ha.
That makes Americas's figure about 1.5 times Republic of Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Americas ranks 11th and Republic of Moldova ranks 9th of 29 groups.
Americas has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Americas | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.21 kg/ha | 5.83 kg/ha | 0.3876 kg/ha | Americas |
| 2000s | 6.91 kg/ha | 3.24 kg/ha | 3.66 kg/ha | Americas |
| 2010s | 8.15 kg/ha | 4.56 kg/ha | 3.59 kg/ha | Americas |
| 2020s | 8.92 kg/ha | 5.13 kg/ha | 3.79 kg/ha | Americas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Americas or Republic of Moldova?
- Americas, at 8.9 kg/ha against 5.81 kg/ha in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Americas and Republic of Moldova?
- 3.09 kg/ha, with Americas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Americas and Republic of Moldova rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Americas ranks 11th and Republic of Moldova ranks 9th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).