Angola vs Cuba: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Angola
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2.62 kg/ha against 2.51 kg/ha in Angola, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 164th and Cuba ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5145 kg/ha | 10.47 kg/ha | 9.95 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.8308 kg/ha | 8.62 kg/ha | 7.79 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 1.11 kg/ha | 11.41 kg/ha | 10.29 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 1.08 kg/ha | 6.07 kg/ha | 4.99 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.41 kg/ha | 3.45 kg/ha | 2.03 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 2.15 kg/ha | 4.27 kg/ha | 2.12 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2.42 kg/ha | 2.88 kg/ha | 0.4613 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Angola or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 2.62 kg/ha against 2.51 kg/ha in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Angola and Cuba?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Cuba rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Angola ranks 164th and Cuba ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).