Antigua and Barbuda vs Lithuania: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Lithuania
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 8.14 kg/ha against 8.13 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 109th and Lithuania ranks 110th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.26 kg/ha | 7.04 kg/ha | 5.22 kg/ha | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2000s | 12.38 kg/ha | 11.1 kg/ha | 1.27 kg/ha | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 9.48 kg/ha | 10.58 kg/ha | 1.1 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 8.46 kg/ha | 9.58 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Antigua and Barbuda or Lithuania?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 8.14 kg/ha against 8.13 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Antigua and Barbuda and Lithuania?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Lithuania rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 109th and Lithuania ranks 110th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).