Argentina vs Azerbaijan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Argentina
- Azerbaijan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 3.96 kg/ha against 3.76 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Argentina ranks 144th and Azerbaijan ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Azerbaijan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Azerbaijan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.43 kg/ha | 2.45 kg/ha | 0.0219 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 2.95 kg/ha | 1.99 kg/ha | 0.9526 kg/ha | Argentina |
| 2010s | 3.08 kg/ha | 3.75 kg/ha | 0.6743 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 4.4 kg/ha | 3.24 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Argentina or Azerbaijan?
- Argentina, at 3.96 kg/ha against 3.76 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Argentina and Azerbaijan?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Azerbaijan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Azerbaijan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Argentina ranks 144th and Azerbaijan ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).