Belgium-Luxembourg vs Turkmenistan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 60.22 kg/ha against 42 kg/ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 18.22 kg/ha.
That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 1.4 times Turkmenistan's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 7th and Turkmenistan ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Belgium-Luxembourg or Turkmenistan?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 60.22 kg/ha against 42 kg/ha in Turkmenistan as of 1999.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Belgium-Luxembourg and Turkmenistan?
- 18.22 kg/ha, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Turkmenistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Turkmenistan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 7th and Turkmenistan ranks 10th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).