Burkina Faso vs Eritrea: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.97 kg/ha against 1.79 kg/ha in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.18 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 162nd and Eritrea ranks 159th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.37 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | 0.8027 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1.83 kg/ha | 1.88 kg/ha | 0.0493 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 2.17 kg/ha | 1.95 kg/ha | 0.2121 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 1.68 kg/ha | 2.13 kg/ha | 0.4538 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burkina Faso or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 1.97 kg/ha against 1.79 kg/ha in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burkina Faso and Eritrea?
- 0.18 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Eritrea rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 162nd and Eritrea ranks 159th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).