Burundi vs Zimbabwe: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burundi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 3.35 kg/ha against 3.23 kg/ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Burundi ranks 154th and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2318 kg/ha | 4.13 kg/ha | 3.9 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 0.3554 kg/ha | 5.06 kg/ha | 4.7 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.4533 kg/ha | 4.45 kg/ha | 3.99 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.4925 kg/ha | 3.62 kg/ha | 3.13 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.5689 kg/ha | 2.42 kg/ha | 1.85 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.72 kg/ha | 2.07 kg/ha | 0.3422 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.99 kg/ha | 3.39 kg/ha | 0.4052 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burundi or Zimbabwe?
- Burundi, at 3.35 kg/ha against 3.23 kg/ha in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burundi and Zimbabwe?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Zimbabwe rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burundi ranks 154th and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).