Cambodia vs Eswatini: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cambodia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 5.6 kg/ha against 5.36 kg/ha in Cambodia, a difference of 0.24 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Cambodia ranks 126th and Eswatini ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.4 kg/ha | 3.47 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 3.21 kg/ha | 4.37 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 2.57 kg/ha | 5.96 kg/ha | 3.39 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 2.93 kg/ha | 3.65 kg/ha | 0.7164 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 3.46 kg/ha | 4.09 kg/ha | 0.6315 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 4.62 kg/ha | 4.8 kg/ha | 0.1823 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 4.9 kg/ha | 5.81 kg/ha | 0.9074 kg/ha | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cambodia or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 5.6 kg/ha against 5.36 kg/ha in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cambodia and Eswatini?
- 0.24 kg/ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Eswatini rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cambodia ranks 126th and Eswatini ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).