Cameroon vs Mali: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cameroon
- Mali
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 1.6 kg/ha against 1.57 kg/ha in Mali, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Cameroon ranks 181st and Mali ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3163 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | 0.7708 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1970s | 0.5853 kg/ha | 1.23 kg/ha | 0.6401 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1980s | 0.8965 kg/ha | 1.49 kg/ha | 0.5943 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1990s | 0.8494 kg/ha | 1.22 kg/ha | 0.3741 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 1.19 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | 0.3662 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 1.51 kg/ha | 2.09 kg/ha | 0.5856 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2020s | 1.61 kg/ha | 1.57 kg/ha | 0.0452 kg/ha | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cameroon or Mali?
- Cameroon, at 1.6 kg/ha against 1.57 kg/ha in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cameroon and Mali?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Mali rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cameroon ranks 181st and Mali ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).