Central Asia vs Uzbekistan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Central Asia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 36.35 kg/ha against 7.9 kg/ha in Central Asia, a difference of 28.45 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 4.6 times Central Asia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 16th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 38 regions.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.28 kg/ha | 21.08 kg/ha | 16.8 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 4.25 kg/ha | 17.97 kg/ha | 13.72 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 6.16 kg/ha | 26.85 kg/ha | 20.69 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 7.6 kg/ha | 34.68 kg/ha | 27.08 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Central Asia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 36.35 kg/ha against 7.9 kg/ha in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Central Asia and Uzbekistan?
- 28.45 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Uzbekistan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Central Asia ranks 16th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).