Chad vs Cuba: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Chad
- Cuba
How they compare
Chad currently reports 2.9 kg/ha against 2.62 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.28 kg/ha.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Chad ranks 147th and Cuba ranks 150th of 186 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.473 kg/ha | 10.47 kg/ha | 9.99 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.5113 kg/ha | 8.62 kg/ha | 8.11 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.6111 kg/ha | 11.41 kg/ha | 10.8 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.9432 kg/ha | 6.07 kg/ha | 5.13 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.42 kg/ha | 3.45 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 1.92 kg/ha | 4.27 kg/ha | 2.35 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2.67 kg/ha | 2.88 kg/ha | 0.2054 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Chad or Cuba?
- Chad, at 2.9 kg/ha against 2.62 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Chad and Cuba?
- 0.28 kg/ha, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Cuba rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Chad ranks 147th and Cuba ranks 150th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).