Chad vs Rwanda: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Chad
- Rwanda
How they compare
Chad currently reports 2.9 kg/ha against 2.8 kg/ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Chad ranks 158th and Rwanda ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.473 kg/ha | 0.4429 kg/ha | 0.0301 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.5113 kg/ha | 0.5117 kg/ha | 0.0004 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0.6111 kg/ha | 0.6104 kg/ha | 0.0007 kg/ha | Chad |
| 1990s | 0.9432 kg/ha | 0.6579 kg/ha | 0.2852 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2000s | 1.42 kg/ha | 1.19 kg/ha | 0.2366 kg/ha | Chad |
| 2010s | 1.92 kg/ha | 2.97 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 2.67 kg/ha | 3.16 kg/ha | 0.4859 kg/ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Chad or Rwanda?
- Chad, at 2.9 kg/ha against 2.8 kg/ha in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Chad and Rwanda?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Rwanda rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Chad ranks 158th and Rwanda ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).