Cuba vs Rwanda: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 2.8 kg/ha against 2.62 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.18 kg/ha.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 162nd and Rwanda ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.47 kg/ha | 0.4429 kg/ha | 10.02 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 8.62 kg/ha | 0.5117 kg/ha | 8.11 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 11.41 kg/ha | 0.6104 kg/ha | 10.8 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 6.07 kg/ha | 0.6579 kg/ha | 5.42 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 3.45 kg/ha | 1.19 kg/ha | 2.26 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 4.27 kg/ha | 2.97 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2.88 kg/ha | 3.16 kg/ha | 0.2805 kg/ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cuba or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 2.8 kg/ha against 2.62 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cuba and Rwanda?
- 0.18 kg/ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Rwanda rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 162nd and Rwanda ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).