Cyprus vs Iceland: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Iceland
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 13.85 kg/ha against 13.84 kg/ha in Iceland, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.
Cyprus ranks 58th and Iceland ranks 59th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.87 kg/ha | 15.61 kg/ha | 12.73 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1970s | 6.12 kg/ha | 18.48 kg/ha | 12.36 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1980s | 10.53 kg/ha | 16.76 kg/ha | 6.23 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1990s | 16.26 kg/ha | 15.32 kg/ha | 0.9428 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 14.59 kg/ha | 15.03 kg/ha | 0.4393 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2010s | 16.2 kg/ha | 15.25 kg/ha | 0.9449 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 13.85 kg/ha | 15.66 kg/ha | 1.81 kg/ha | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cyprus or Iceland?
- Cyprus, at 13.85 kg/ha against 13.84 kg/ha in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cyprus and Iceland?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Iceland rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 58th and Iceland ranks 59th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).