Ecuador vs Nauru: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 10.38 kg/ha against 10.33 kg/ha in Ecuador, a difference of 0.05 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.
Ecuador ranks 88th and Nauru ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Nauru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.66 kg/ha | 4.55 kg/ha | 0.8865 kg/ha | Nauru |
| 1970s | 5.85 kg/ha | 5.45 kg/ha | 0.3917 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 6.64 kg/ha | 7.57 kg/ha | 0.9332 kg/ha | Nauru |
| 1990s | 7.35 kg/ha | 9.5 kg/ha | 2.15 kg/ha | Nauru |
| 2000s | 11.84 kg/ha | 9.83 kg/ha | 2.01 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 14.52 kg/ha | 10.3 kg/ha | 4.22 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 13.72 kg/ha | 10.4 kg/ha | 3.32 kg/ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ecuador or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 10.38 kg/ha against 10.33 kg/ha in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ecuador and Nauru?
- 0.05 kg/ha, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nauru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Nauru rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 88th and Nauru ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).