Ethiopia PDR vs Libya: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Libya
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 1.3 kg/ha against 1.28 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 188th and Libya ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7586 kg/ha | 0.2521 kg/ha | 0.5065 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 0.7808 kg/ha | 0.7568 kg/ha | 0.024 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 0.9831 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | 0.7316 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1990s | 1.3 kg/ha | 1.82 kg/ha | 0.5145 kg/ha | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Libya?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 1.3 kg/ha against 1.28 kg/ha in Libya as of 1992.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Libya?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Libya rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 188th and Libya ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).