Ethiopia vs Papua New Guinea: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 4.62 kg/ha against 4.33 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 127th and Papua New Guinea ranks 124th of 186 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.51 kg/ha | 3.24 kg/ha | 1.73 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 1.68 kg/ha | 3.77 kg/ha | 2.09 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 2.79 kg/ha | 4.32 kg/ha | 1.53 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 3.86 kg/ha | 4.7 kg/ha | 0.8464 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 4.62 kg/ha against 4.33 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.29 kg/ha, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 127th and Papua New Guinea ranks 124th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).