Fiji vs Saudi Arabia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 8.69 kg/ha against 8.51 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.18 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 101st and Saudi Arabia ranks 104th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 6 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.95 kg/ha | 0.2568 kg/ha | 3.69 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1970s | 6.95 kg/ha | 0.4758 kg/ha | 6.47 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1980s | 7.71 kg/ha | 5.82 kg/ha | 1.89 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1990s | 6.99 kg/ha | 6.52 kg/ha | 0.4772 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2000s | 7.3 kg/ha | 6.39 kg/ha | 0.9051 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2010s | 7.45 kg/ha | 6.12 kg/ha | 1.33 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2020s | 7.79 kg/ha | 8.39 kg/ha | 0.5983 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Fiji or Saudi Arabia?
- Fiji, at 8.69 kg/ha against 8.51 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Fiji and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.18 kg/ha, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Saudi Arabia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 101st and Saudi Arabia ranks 104th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).