Georgia vs Guatemala: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 12.37 kg/ha against 12.35 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.
Georgia ranks 72nd and Guatemala ranks 71st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.14 kg/ha | 9.53 kg/ha | 4.39 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 5.49 kg/ha | 10.12 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 5.99 kg/ha | 12.46 kg/ha | 6.47 kg/ha | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 12.52 kg/ha | 12.41 kg/ha | 0.1095 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Georgia or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 12.37 kg/ha against 12.35 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Georgia and Guatemala?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Guatemala?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Guatemala rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 72nd and Guatemala ranks 71st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).