Georgia vs Serbia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 12.35 kg/ha against 12.27 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Georgia ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.84 kg/ha | 16.07 kg/ha | 10.23 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 5.99 kg/ha | 13.4 kg/ha | 7.41 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2020s | 12.52 kg/ha | 12.13 kg/ha | 0.3967 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Georgia or Serbia?
- Georgia, at 12.35 kg/ha against 12.27 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).