Guyana vs Norway: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Guyana
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 24.76 kg/ha against 24.01 kg/ha in Guyana, a difference of 0.75 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Guyana ranks 30th and Norway ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.8 kg/ha | 20.05 kg/ha | 10.26 kg/ha | Norway |
| 1970s | 14.81 kg/ha | 23.36 kg/ha | 8.55 kg/ha | Norway |
| 1980s | 12.47 kg/ha | 24.09 kg/ha | 11.62 kg/ha | Norway |
| 1990s | 13.84 kg/ha | 22.64 kg/ha | 8.8 kg/ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 16.63 kg/ha | 22.88 kg/ha | 6.25 kg/ha | Norway |
| 2010s | 22.33 kg/ha | 23.85 kg/ha | 1.53 kg/ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 25.73 kg/ha | 25.06 kg/ha | 0.6768 kg/ha | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Guyana or Norway?
- Norway, at 24.76 kg/ha against 24.01 kg/ha in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Guyana and Norway?
- 0.75 kg/ha, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Norway rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Guyana ranks 30th and Norway ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).