Haiti vs Russian Federation: Leaching β Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching β Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Haiti
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 3.66 kg/ha against 3.63 kg/ha in Haiti, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Haiti ranks 150th and Russian Federation ranks 148th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.11 kg/ha | 4.05 kg/ha | 0.9325 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 3.98 kg/ha | 2.75 kg/ha | 1.23 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2010s | 3.52 kg/ha | 2.95 kg/ha | 0.5671 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2020s | 3.65 kg/ha | 3.56 kg/ha | 0.0907 kg/ha | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching β cropland nitrogen per unit area, Haiti or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 3.66 kg/ha against 3.63 kg/ha in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching β cropland nitrogen per unit area between Haiti and Russian Federation?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Russian Federation rank globally for leaching β cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 150th and Russian Federation ranks 148th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching β Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).