Indonesia vs Nepal: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Indonesia
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 11.97 kg/ha against 11.79 kg/ha in Indonesia, a difference of 0.18 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.
Indonesia ranks 76th and Nepal ranks 75th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.12 kg/ha | 3.95 kg/ha | 1.83 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 1970s | 3.07 kg/ha | 4.56 kg/ha | 1.49 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 1980s | 6.33 kg/ha | 6.18 kg/ha | 0.1508 kg/ha | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 8.32 kg/ha | 8.11 kg/ha | 0.2077 kg/ha | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 9.06 kg/ha | 7.1 kg/ha | 1.96 kg/ha | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 10.96 kg/ha | 12.82 kg/ha | 1.87 kg/ha | Nepal |
| 2020s | 12.35 kg/ha | 15.36 kg/ha | 3.01 kg/ha | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Indonesia or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 11.97 kg/ha against 11.79 kg/ha in Indonesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Indonesia and Nepal?
- 0.18 kg/ha, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Nepal rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Indonesia ranks 76th and Nepal ranks 75th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).