Indonesia vs Serbia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Indonesia
11.79 kg/ha
in 2023
Serbia
12.27 kg/ha
in 2023
Indonesia rank
76th
Serbia rank
73rd

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Indonesia
  • Serbia
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 12.27 kg/ha against 11.79 kg/ha in Indonesia, a difference of 0.48 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 76th and Serbia ranks 73rd of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 9.65 kg/ha 16.07 kg/ha 6.42 kg/ha Serbia
2010s 10.96 kg/ha 13.4 kg/ha 2.45 kg/ha Serbia
2020s 12.35 kg/ha 12.13 kg/ha 0.2212 kg/ha Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Indonesia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 12.27 kg/ha against 11.79 kg/ha in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Indonesia and Serbia?
0.48 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Serbia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Indonesia ranks 76th and Serbia ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).