Israel vs Sweden: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Israel
- Sweden
How they compare
Israel currently reports 12.12 kg/ha against 11.64 kg/ha in Sweden, a difference of 0.48 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Israel ranks 74th and Sweden ranks 77th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.76 kg/ha | 11.69 kg/ha | 4.93 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1970s | 10.02 kg/ha | 14.54 kg/ha | 4.52 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1980s | 13.61 kg/ha | 14.64 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1990s | 13.97 kg/ha | 13.46 kg/ha | 0.5165 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2000s | 15.25 kg/ha | 12.41 kg/ha | 2.84 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2010s | 14.4 kg/ha | 12.49 kg/ha | 1.91 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2020s | 12.84 kg/ha | 12.12 kg/ha | 0.7225 kg/ha | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Israel or Sweden?
- Israel, at 12.12 kg/ha against 11.64 kg/ha in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Israel and Sweden?
- 0.48 kg/ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Sweden rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Israel ranks 74th and Sweden ranks 77th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).