Japan vs Serbia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Japan
12.45 kg/ha
in 2023
Serbia
12.27 kg/ha
in 2023
Japan rank
70th
Serbia rank
73rd

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Japan
  • Serbia
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 12.45 kg/ha against 12.27 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 0.18 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Japan ranks 70th and Serbia ranks 73rd of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 13.02 kg/ha 16.07 kg/ha 3.05 kg/ha Serbia
2010s 12.57 kg/ha 13.4 kg/ha 0.8335 kg/ha Serbia
2020s 12.55 kg/ha 12.13 kg/ha 0.4211 kg/ha Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Japan or Serbia?
Japan, at 12.45 kg/ha against 12.27 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Japan and Serbia?
0.18 kg/ha, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Japan and Serbia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Japan ranks 70th and Serbia ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).