Kazakhstan vs Sudan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 1.38 kg/ha against 1.3 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 175th and Sudan ranks 174th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.37 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | 0.0696 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 1.31 kg/ha | 1.53 kg/ha | 0.2259 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kazakhstan or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 1.38 kg/ha against 1.3 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 175th and Sudan ranks 174th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).