Kiribati vs Tunisia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- Tunisia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 2.02 kg/ha against 1.98 kg/ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 171st and Tunisia ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5285 kg/ha | 0.3071 kg/ha | 0.2214 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 0.634 kg/ha | 0.6153 kg/ha | 0.0187 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 0.728 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | 0.3598 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 0.9074 kg/ha | 1.4 kg/ha | 0.4878 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 1.53 kg/ha | 1.86 kg/ha | 0.3286 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 1.91 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | 0.2586 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 2.01 kg/ha | 2.41 kg/ha | 0.4058 kg/ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kiribati or Tunisia?
- Kiribati, at 2.02 kg/ha against 1.98 kg/ha in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kiribati and Tunisia?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Tunisia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 171st and Tunisia ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).