Latvia vs Peru: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Peru
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 7.7 kg/ha against 7.69 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 113th and Peru ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.97 kg/ha | 5.4 kg/ha | 1.57 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6.77 kg/ha | 7.67 kg/ha | 0.9035 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2010s | 8.04 kg/ha | 8.97 kg/ha | 0.9227 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2020s | 8.03 kg/ha | 8.47 kg/ha | 0.4349 kg/ha | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Latvia or Peru?
- Latvia, at 7.7 kg/ha against 7.69 kg/ha in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Latvia and Peru?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Peru?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Peru rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 113th and Peru ranks 114th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).