Lebanon vs Panama: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Lebanon
- Panama
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 11.29 kg/ha against 10.98 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 0.31 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 80th and Panama ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.34 kg/ha | 4 kg/ha | 0.3378 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 6.96 kg/ha | 4.8 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 6.89 kg/ha | 5.46 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 8.18 kg/ha | 6.43 kg/ha | 1.75 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 10.08 kg/ha | 6.06 kg/ha | 4.02 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 12.79 kg/ha | 6.92 kg/ha | 5.87 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 10.05 kg/ha | 9.95 kg/ha | 0.0933 kg/ha | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Lebanon or Panama?
- Lebanon, at 11.29 kg/ha against 10.98 kg/ha in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Lebanon and Panama?
- 0.31 kg/ha, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Panama rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Lebanon ranks 80th and Panama ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).