Mali vs Sudan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Mali
1.57 kg/ha
in 2023
Sudan
1.38 kg/ha
in 2023
Mali rank
183rd
Sudan rank
186th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Mali
  • Sudan
11.522.53196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 1.57 kg/ha against 1.38 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.19 kg/ha.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mali ahead.

Mali ranks 183rd and Sudan ranks 186th of 201 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 2.18 kg/ha 1.3 kg/ha 0.8785 kg/ha Mali
2020s 1.57 kg/ha 1.53 kg/ha 0.0341 kg/ha Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Mali or Sudan?
Mali, at 1.57 kg/ha against 1.38 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Mali and Sudan?
0.19 kg/ha, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Mali and Sudan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Mali ranks 183rd and Sudan ranks 186th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).