Myanmar vs Polynesia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Myanmar
- Polynesia
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 4.6 kg/ha against 4.41 kg/ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0.19 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 134th and Polynesia ranks 137th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 5 and Polynesia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.09 kg/ha | 1.54 kg/ha | 0.5519 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 3.07 kg/ha | 2.09 kg/ha | 0.98 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 4.49 kg/ha | 3.66 kg/ha | 0.8302 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 4.63 kg/ha | 5.1 kg/ha | 0.4648 kg/ha | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 5.17 kg/ha | 6.1 kg/ha | 0.9351 kg/ha | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 7.24 kg/ha | 5.1 kg/ha | 2.14 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 5.67 kg/ha | 4.49 kg/ha | 1.17 kg/ha | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Myanmar or Polynesia?
- Myanmar, at 4.6 kg/ha against 4.41 kg/ha in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Myanmar and Polynesia?
- 0.19 kg/ha, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Polynesia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Myanmar ranks 134th and Polynesia ranks 137th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).