Northern America vs Uzbekistan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Northern America
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 36.35 kg/ha against 8.05 kg/ha in Northern America, a difference of 28.3 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 4.5 times Northern America's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Northern America ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 29 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern America | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.1 kg/ha | 21.08 kg/ha | 14.98 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 6.66 kg/ha | 17.97 kg/ha | 11.31 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 7.75 kg/ha | 26.85 kg/ha | 19.1 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 8.02 kg/ha | 34.68 kg/ha | 26.66 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Northern America or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 36.35 kg/ha against 8.05 kg/ha in Northern America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Northern America and Uzbekistan?
- 28.3 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Northern America and Uzbekistan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Northern America ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).