Togo vs Uganda: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Togo
- Uganda
How they compare
Togo currently reports 2.51 kg/ha against 2.44 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Togo ranks 165th and Uganda ranks 166th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Togo averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3876 kg/ha | 0.3314 kg/ha | 0.0562 kg/ha | Togo |
| 1970s | 0.4728 kg/ha | 0.4185 kg/ha | 0.0543 kg/ha | Togo |
| 1980s | 0.612 kg/ha | 0.4641 kg/ha | 0.1479 kg/ha | Togo |
| 1990s | 0.8614 kg/ha | 0.9201 kg/ha | 0.0587 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0.874 kg/ha | 1.26 kg/ha | 0.3855 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 1.44 kg/ha | 1.84 kg/ha | 0.398 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 1.99 kg/ha | 2.37 kg/ha | 0.3856 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Togo or Uganda?
- Togo, at 2.51 kg/ha against 2.44 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Togo and Uganda?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Togo and Uganda rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Togo ranks 165th and Uganda ranks 166th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).