Uruguay vs Yugoslav SFR: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Uruguay
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 11.45 kg/ha against 10.99 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0.46 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Uruguay ranks 79th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uruguay | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.57 kg/ha | 8.7 kg/ha | 6.13 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 3.76 kg/ha | 11.82 kg/ha | 8.05 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 5.36 kg/ha | 14.03 kg/ha | 8.67 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 6.2 kg/ha | 11.93 kg/ha | 5.72 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Uruguay or Yugoslav SFR?
- Uruguay, at 11.45 kg/ha against 10.99 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Uruguay and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.46 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Uruguay and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Uruguay ranks 79th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).