Afghanistan vs Norway: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Afghanistan
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 19,953 t against 17,885 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 2,068 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 82nd and Norway ranks 80th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,884 t | 16,990 t | 4,106 t | Norway |
| 1970s | 14,860 t | 18,738 t | 3,878 t | Norway |
| 1980s | 14,619 t | 20,562 t | 5,944 t | Norway |
| 1990s | 12,014 t | 20,598 t | 8,584 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 12,992 t | 19,854 t | 6,863 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 21,243 t | 19,374 t | 1,870 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 17,685 t | 20,218 t | 2,533 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Afghanistan or Norway?
- Norway, at 19,953 t against 17,885 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Afghanistan and Norway?
- 2,068 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Norway rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Afghanistan ranks 82nd and Norway ranks 80th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).