Albania vs Estonia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Albania
6,745 t
in 2023
Estonia
5,598 t
in 2023
Albania rank
121st
Estonia rank
124th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Albania
  • Estonia
5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Albania currently reports 6,745 t against 5,598 t in Estonia, a difference of 1,147 t.

That makes Albania's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Albania ranks 121st and Estonia ranks 124th of 201 countries.

Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 8,999 t 6,288 t 2,710 t Albania
2000s 10,660 t 4,586 t 6,074 t Albania
2010s 10,205 t 5,475 t 4,730 t Albania
2020s 7,388 t 5,996 t 1,393 t Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Albania or Estonia?
Albania, at 6,745 t against 5,598 t in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Albania and Estonia?
1,147 t, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Estonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Albania and Estonia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Albania ranks 121st and Estonia ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).