Angola vs Croatia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Angola
- Croatia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 14,299 t against 13,846 t in Croatia, a difference of 453 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Angola ranks 93rd and Croatia ranks 94th of 201 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,446 t | 18,532 t | 15,086 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 5,014 t | 22,061 t | 17,047 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 11,394 t | 15,946 t | 4,551 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 13,727 t | 15,006 t | 1,279 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Angola or Croatia?
- Angola, at 14,299 t against 13,846 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Angola and Croatia?
- 453 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Croatia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Angola ranks 93rd and Croatia ranks 94th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).